eWeek & Gartner Got it Wrong on Big Data: Why You Should Care

Even the best sometimes whiff at what really matters. Today, it’s eWeek and Gartner.

eWEEK’s Big Ideas about Big Data (8/15/11) Big Data definition, “with help from research firm Gartner:”  “Big data refers to the volume, variety and velocity of structured and unstructured data pouring through networks into processors and storage devices, along with the conversion of such data into business advice for enterprises.”

That’s like saying “New ideas come from electricity moving among brain cells.”  It’s correct, but emphasis is wrong. It makes sense an IT-oriented firm like Gartner would focus on speeds, feeds, and infrastructure, but executives need a different view.

 Let’s be clear, Big Data is NOT simply dealing with a lots data! I sympathize with colleagues who hate the name. After all, 1,000 movies is a Petabyte. But 1,000 movies is not a Big Data problem. On the other hand, I just spoke with the CTO of a top Pharmaceutical firm. They have a serious Big Data initiative…and the total data fits on a single hard drive.

So what IS Big Data? NEW meaning from NEW sources

Big Data is finding new meaning from new data sources. New meaning that was never practical to find before—because of scale, data format, distribution of data in may locations, the fact that no one thought of looking before, etc. Sources from Lego store purchase patterns to iPhone GPS info. From automobile traffic patterns to internet data traffic patterns. From weather to earthquakes. From tech support response times to medication response times. It is EASILY as much a new mindset as new technology. NEW meaning from NEW sources.

Why should you care? Because just for a start, businesses can learn what to offer and to whom. When to offersomething new and through what channels. Which employee can best solve a problem and when to get outside help. Which competitor will win and when their stock price will reflect the victory. I’ll go out on a limb here: I consider Big Data the most important thing for business since the Internet. (Feel free to tell me I’m off-base in comments!)

The hard part: Where to start? When something will change everything, where do you start? CIOs think about data storage, clusters, Hadoop, and data sources. Marketers think of customer behavior, influence patterns, and traffic flows. CEOs and CFOs think about ROI on (what will clearly be) new infrastructure and staffing.

When the internet was born, it was—truly—a baby. We all grew up with it. When it was small, we did small things. As it grew in power and reach, we did bigger things.

The birth of Big Data is different

The birth of Big Data is different from the birth of the Internet because the data explosion is already here. The information to refine or reinvent your industry probably exists (although it too will expand enormously in the coming  years). What will you do? Will you wait until the field it fully baked and play me-too with competitors? Or will you accept that Big Data is a new way to think about decisions?

A favorite saying is, “When the paradigm shifts, everyone goes to zero.” Another is “when your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.” Both apply. Please comment and let us know how you are responding.

 

TAKEAWAYS

  1. Gather at least a cocktail party understanding of Big Data implications for your field…now.
  2. Reflecting on data already being collected in your field (or fields affecting you) and how deeper understanding can change your decisions…or even your approach to how companies compete.
  3. Start writing down the sort of questions capable of changing how companies compete in your field. You’ll be able to answer them sooner than you may think. Hint: Start with “Why do…?”

QUESTIONS for 9/19/11 #UsGuysChat (This is our first time hitting this deep topic, so may not get to all depending on conversation flow.)

Q1 [quick one]:  How many discussions have you been in on Big Data? (This is my first, several, many, so many that I avoid them now)

 Q2: What does “Big Data” mean to you?

 Q3: In what FUNCTIONS do you expect Big Data to have the greatest impact?

 Q4: In what INDUSTRIES do you expect Big Data to have the greatest impact?

 Q5: What should we do or learn now (tech, new types of questions, key players, etc.) to prepare for the rise of Big Data?

 Q6: How can we best help others to understand the implications of Big Data?

7 Responses to eWeek & Gartner Got it Wrong on Big Data: Why You Should Care
  1. Jason
    September 4, 2011 | 11:50 pm

    Very nice, i suggest webmaster can set up a forum, so that we can talk and communicate.

  2. Diablo 3
    September 6, 2011 | 7:25 am

    I would like to thnkx for your efforts you’ve got place in composing this weblog. I’m hoping the same high-grade web site submit from you in the upcoming as well. In fact your creative creating abilities has inspired me to acquire my own website now. Actually the running a blog is spreading its wings quickly. Your write up is really a very good example of it.

  3. [...] Which is why we were gratified to discover this recent post from Performance Talks entitled eWeek & Gartner Got it Wrong on Big Data: Why You Should Care. To quote: Big Data is finding new meaning from new data [...]

  4. Fred McClimans
    September 19, 2011 | 6:19 am

    Hey Ken – Great post. Yes, there is a shift underfoot and it is being missed by many. Do I think Gartner is wrong in their definition of Big Data? Yeah, but I’m not sure that they are wrong as much as they are out of date. I think the shift that we need to think about is the splitting of Big data into “large” data and “new, diverse” data. Some people will still need “large” data to make a decision, but new data is becoming much more important.

    Taking it further, I believe that diversity of data, and opinion, is the key element required to make the decisions we need to make moving forward whether we are talking large or new data.

    The best posts (or discussions) always make me think about something in a different light, and this one certainly did. Nice job.

  5. Ken Rosen
    September 19, 2011 | 1:33 pm

    Fred,
    Thanks for the comment and I agree–pure scale matters, but some of the most interesting value will come from that “new, diverse” data you mention.

    Personally, I’m torn: As we saw in the online chat on this topic, Big Data is still very new for many people. In trying to bring clarity, does it help to avoid segmenting the field for a while while people get comfortable OR it is better to make these important schisms in the meaning early (e.g. your “scale” vs. “diversity” point)? Maybe it varies by individual’s learning styles? You are in the business of teaching people emerging technology regularly, so what have you found to be most helpful?

    Looking forward to connecting soon,

    Ken

  6. Lovella Kribbs
    October 6, 2011 | 4:40 am

    I love what you guys tend to be up too. This type of clever work and reporting! Keep up the very good works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to blogroll.

  7. Karen Janowski
    October 11, 2011 | 9:49 am

    You might want to check out the McKinsey Global Institute report on Big Data, particularly their points about how Big Data creates value and also potentially competitive advantage and market disruptions.

    I’m very excited about the potential innovations and experimentation that can be supported by data analysis on a grand scale. This whole area also poses some very interesting privacy, ethics and legal (data ownership) issues that will be fascinating to address.

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://www.perworks.com/eweek-gartner-got-big-data-wrong/trackback/